Part 3: Oyster Harvesting Vessels and Tools: A Historical and Technological Evolution

Oyster Harvesting Vessels and Tools: A Historical and Technological Evolution 

Early Beginnings and Indigenous Influence
The roots of oyster harvesting in North America trace back to the Indigenous peoples who first developed techniques for gathering oysters. Early European settlers quickly adopted these methods, particularly the use of dugout canoes, and adapted them to suit their needs. Indigenous canoes were traditionally crafted from hardwoods like maple and oak, but settlers favored pine due to its greater abundance and ease of working. The introduction of iron tools further refined boat construction, leading to improvements in design. Over time, settlers modified these early craft, resulting in a variety of small boats—such as skiffs, sharpies, and open rowboats—that became essential for oyster harvesting. 

“‘Oyster boat’ may refer to anything from a skiff to a steamer. Essentially, it means any boat associated in some way with oystering. More specifically, it functions, solely or jointly, as a platform from which oysters are harvested (raked, tonged, or dredged), as a vehicle for freighting and shifting them, or for maintaining the beds.” (Kochiss 1991, 91) 

The Rise of Sail-Powered Craft
By the 19th century, sail-powered vessels, such as catboats and sloops, became the preferred choice for oystermen, thanks to their mobility and capacity. These boats were particularly well-suited for the shallow waters of regions like Long Island’s Great South Bay. The flat-bottomed skiff, which followed the indigenous canoe design, remained popular due to its simplicity and ease of construction. Its flat-bottomed hull allowed it to navigate easily through sandbars and shoals. 

Among the boats that emerged, the sharpie, known for its flat-bottomed hull, became especially favored for tonging in shallow, protected waters. However, it was less suited for dredging, making it an ideal, inexpensive, and easy-to-maintain vessel for many oystermen. Meanwhile, larger boats, such as those resembling sloops, offered additional space and stability, which proved perfect for transporting oysters to market. 

The Evolution of the New York Sloop
In the latter half of the 19th century, the cat- or sloop-rigged centerboarder became a widespread vessel in the Great South Bay. Originally designed for general work in shallow waters, this boat became integral to the local oyster industry. Known as the New York sloop, it emerged in the 1830s, characterized by its wide, shoal centerboard and V-shaped hull. Adaptable, seaworthy, and perfectly suited for oyster harvesting, the New York sloop quickly spread throughout the northeastern United States, including New Jersey and Long Island Sound. 

Typically ranging from 18 to 36 feet in length, New York sloops were highly effective for the needs of oystermen. Many fast oyster sloops were even converted into racing vessels, with certain models gaining fame for their speed. Conversely, slower racing sloops were often refitted as working boats. Over time, the rigging of these vessels evolved—especially after the Civil War. The mast was moved further aft, and the gaff was extended, which improved performance. 

Types of New York Sloops
As historian Chapelle notes, Kochiss outlines three primary configurations of the New York sloop, each tailored to meet the needs of the oyster industry: 

  1. The Open Deck Boat: Typically 18 to 25 feet long, these vessels lacked a cabin and featured an open hold amidships for carrying oysters. Often converted into racing boats, these vessels—particularly the sandbaggers—became famous for their exceptional speed. 
  2. Open Boat with Forward Cabin: Similar to the open deck boat but with a cabin located near or aft of the mast. This design was ideal for transporting oysters, as the cabin helped prevent cargo from shifting when the boat heeled over. Slightly larger than open deck boats, these vessels also provided shelter for the crew. 
  3. Deck Boat with Cabin Aft and Hold Forward: The most common type of oyster boat in New York and Great South Bay, these boats typically measured over 30 feet in length. They featured a fully decked hull with a hold amidships, and larger vessels often had a forecastle for crew accommodations. This configuration was highly seaworthy and easy to handle, especially when transporting oysters to market. 

Notable Long Island-built vessels include the Ann Gertrude (built in Patchogue in 1851), the J.F. Penny (built in Moriches in 1884), and the Priscilla and Ally Ray (medium south-side boats built in Patchogue between 1887 and 1889). South Side Long Island boat builders, many of English and Dutch descent, gained a reputation for constructing high-quality vessels. Their craftsmanship attracted oystermen from Connecticut, who sought out these well-made boats for their operations. 

Key figures in boat design included builders such as Oliver Perry Smith and his son Martenus, Samuel C. Wicks & Son, George Miller, Forrest, Charles, and Filmore Baker, George Bishop, and DeWitt Conklin. Other notable builders included Ottis Palmer of East Moriches, the Post brothers of Bellport, Sam Newey of Brookhaven, and Young of Great River. On the North Shore, builders like the Harts (Pryor, Erastus, and Oliver), Chas G. Sammis of Huntington, William Bedell of Glenwood (later Stratford, CT), and the Bayles of Port Jefferson contributed significantly to the industry. 

A notable example of a scallop dredge, the Modesty, was built by Wood and Chute of Greenport, NY. Modeled after a sloop built in Great South Bay called Honest, the Modesty was designed for both oystering and scalloping and remains one of the last two sailing workboats built on Long Island. Modesty and Perscilla were both used to aid shipwrights when restoring Mystic Seaport’s Nellie back to her original sailing build. 

As Kochiss mentions, important sailmakers of Long Island, including Charles Miller (whose shop was located above Samuel C. Wicks & Son in Patchogue), worked closely with boat builders. Independent sailmakers like Frank C. Brown of Patchogue and Frank Mills of Greenport also contributed to the success of these vessels. Wm J. Mills and Co. is the oldest sailmaking family in America, and Mystic Seaport Museum holds the family’s collection of historic sail plans dating as early as 1857. 

Wm. J. Mills & Co. sailoft in Greenport, Long Island, NY. Image courtesy of the Wm. J. Mills & Co.

Freight and the Versatility of Coastwise Schooners
Freight carriers, often referred to as “coastwise schooners,” “Long Island Sound freighters,” or simply “runners,” were typically centerboarders known for their remarkable versatility. These vessels had a shallow draft and long, straight keels that allowed them to rest on beaches between tides, making them ideal for loading cargo such as cordwood or sand for foundries, and for repairs. 

Many areas around the coast of Long Island and throughout the sound provided incredible challenges due to unique beds, shallow waters, large sandbars, and more, making sailing hazardous. Due to the design of the freight vessels, they provided a safer form of transporting oysters, but at an additional cost. 

Innovation in Vessel Design
In addition to traditional vessel designs, some boat builders created specialized craft tailored specifically to the needs of oystermen. These innovations enhanced the efficiency, performance, and comfort of those working the oyster beds. However, oystermen were never content to rely solely on conventional designs. Driven by a constant desire to improve their vessels and harvesting methods, they continually sought new solutions. As a result, fleets of standard boats were often supplemented by more unusual craft—each offering unique advantages to the industry. Among the most inventive were a paddle-wheeler, several power scows, a trimaran, and even a small submarine (Kochiss 1991, 146). These unconventional designs underscore the creativity and resourcefulness of oystermen, who sought to address the ever-evolving challenges of their trade. These unique boats, though unconventional, illustrate the dynamic nature of the oyster industry and the persistent drive for innovation among its practitioners. 

The sidewheel dredge boat, designed by Captain Charles S. Mott and built in Patchogue in 1894, is another notable example. Another “novel oyster boat,” a scow called Peconic, was completed in 1907 by Greenport Basin & Construction Co. yards. The vessel, specifically engineered to navigate the narrow Shinnecock Canal while transporting oysters, was built for Fred Lewis, Jacob Ockers, Wm. J. Mills, and Fred Ronik (Kochiss 1991, 147). 

The Transition to Powered Vessels
The arrival of steam, gas, and diesel engines in the late 19th century marked a pivotal shift in the oyster harvesting industry. Powered vessels allowed for faster, more efficient harvesting, though many oystermen continued to rely on traditional sailboats for a number of reasons, including state regulations that restricted the use of power vessels when harvesting in bays, rivers, and low areas of water. As steam-powered dredges became more common, larger companies began to design and produce equipment, including dredges, hoisters, and engines to operate them. 

In response to the increasing use of steam power, oystermen feared that the new technology would deplete oyster beds, leading to legislation in 1879 that restricted the use of powerboats on natural beds to just one week per year. This law, aimed at preserving oyster stocks, helped maintain the dominance of sailboats for a time. However, by the 1880s, steam-powered boats were fully embraced, and many oystermen transitioned to these new vessels. 

Despite initial opposition to steam-powered boats, particularly from oystermen who feared the impact on natural beds, the technology eventually gained widespread acceptance. By the 1880s, steam-powered boats had proven their worth, and oystermen increasingly relied on these vessels for their efficiency. The introduction of gasoline engines further transformed the industry, offering oystermen a more compact, easier-to-maintain alternative to steam. 

One notable vessel, the Louis R., built in Stratford, Connecticut for the Andrew Radel Oyster Company, was the last steam-powered oyster boat in the region, finally converting to diesel in 1961. 

Gas-powered boats became particularly popular due to their ease of use, requiring no fireman or engineer, and with quick-starting engines. The design of these boats evolved as well, with the addition of an extended house to protect oysters during transport. These boats often retained masts for emergency situations, hoisting sails for power when the engine failed as well as the sails providing stability in bad weather. The introduction of gasoline engines marked a brief but significant period of innovation, leading to a resurgence in demand for wooden boat construction. 

However, regulations on natural oyster beds in New York limited the use of powered dredging, and by the early 20th century, wooden shipbuilding had largely faded from southern New England. Iron and steel replaced wood for most vessels, though only a few steel oyster boats were ever built. By the 1930s, the construction of oyster boats in the New York and Connecticut areas had significantly declined. The majority of building took place in Maine. 

Tools of the Trade: From Hand Rakes to Modern Machinery
The tools used in oyster harvesting evolved alongside the vessels. Early Indigenous techniques included simple hand-held rakes made from forked sticks, as depicted in a 1585 drawing by John White. By the mid-18th century, more sophisticated rake designs were in use, with long iron teeth bent inward for greater efficiency. These rakes were commonly lashed together in pairs for use by single or double fishermen. 

As the 19th century progressed, local blacksmiths began crafting specialized oyster tools, including tongs, which became synonymous with American oystering. These tongs were ideal for shallow waters and were often used on small boats like skiffs, canoes, and sharpies. There were several types of tongs, including scraper, oval, and toothed blades, each suited for different conditions. 

The invention of the dredge, which had been used by the Romans and introduced to America by the British, revolutionized the oyster industry. Dredges allowed oystermen to harvest oysters from deeper beds, significantly improving efficiency. By the late 19th century, mechanical dredges, hydraulic booms, and other innovations further modernized the industry. 

Modernization and the Future of Oystering
Today, oyster cultivation methods reflect a blend of tradition and innovation. While some oystermen continue to rely on bottom culturing methods—producing oysters with strong shells but leaving them vulnerable to predators—others have embraced off-bottom methods like cage culture, rack-and-bag culture, and suspended culture. These newer techniques offer better protection from predators and more controlled growing environments, though they come with their own set of challenges. 

Technological advancements have also reshaped the industry. The introduction of automated sorting machines and tumbler systems has increased the efficiency of sorting oysters by size and controlling shape. These innovations allow oyster producers to meet the commercial demand for consistently shaped oysters, reducing the labor-intensive nature of harvesting and packaging. 

However, modern oystering faces new challenges—both environmental and man-made—forcing the oyster industry to continue adapting. Looking ahead, the future of oystering on Long Island remains promising. With a renewed focus on sustainability, efficiency, and technological innovation, the oyster industry is poised to thrive. While the challenges may evolve, the adaptability of oystermen and their continued embrace of new techniques will ensure that the legacy of oystering endures for generations to come. 

From its Indigenous roots to its modern technological advancements, oystering on Long Island has evolved significantly over the centuries. The vessels, tools, and methods used by oystermen have continuously adapted to meet the challenges of the times, ensuring that the industry remains a vital part of the region’s culture and economy. 

Part 2: The Oyster: A Cornerstone of Ecology and Economy

The Oyster: A Cornerstone of Ecology and Economy 

Oysters have been an integral part of Long Island’s history, ecology, and economy for centuries. From their use in the 16th century for culinary and medicinal purposes to their continued importance today, oysters remain a vital resource. Not only do they provide nourishment, but they also play an essential role in maintaining the health of coastal ecosystems. This intricate relationship between geography, environmental conditions, and human activity underscores the oyster’s value as both an ecological pillar and a driver of economic prosperity. 

Oysters as Ecological Pillars 

Beyond their economic value, oysters are fundamental to the vitality of coastal ecosystems. The Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica), alongside other species, is celebrated for its exceptional filtration abilities. A single oyster can filter up to 50 gallons of water per day, removing excess nutrients, plankton, and suspended particles. This filtration process is vital for maintaining water quality, preventing nutrient overload, and reducing the risk of harmful algal blooms and oxygen-depleted “dead zones.” 

In addition to their water-purifying role, oysters help shape the physical structure of coastal habitats. As they grow, oysters form dense reefs that provide critical shelter and breeding grounds for a wide variety of marine species, including fish, crabs, invertebrates, and even birds. These oyster reefs are often referred to as “ecosystem engineers” due to their ability to stabilize shorelines, protect against erosion, and enhance biodiversity. In this way, oysters contribute not only to the ecological health of the environment but also to its physical resilience. 

The Diversity of Oysters: Species and Growth 

While many species of oysters exist, the Eastern Oyster is the most prominent along the Atlantic Coast of the United States. It has been a cornerstone of oyster farming since the 19th century, stretching from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mexico. Known by several names, such as the American oyster, Atlantic oyster, or Virginia oyster, the Eastern Oyster thrives in both brackish and salty waters, typically at depths between 8 to 35 feet. In warmer regions, it can even survive in the intertidal zone. Sets of this species were brought from Virginia to New England and New York during a time of great decline in oyster numbers due to overfishing and pollution. 

As bivalve mollusks, oysters are sessile—meaning they attach themselves to solid surfaces or other oysters, forming dense, resilient reefs. They are known for their rapid growth and high reproductive capacity, with a single female capable of releasing over 100 million eggs in a single spawning event. Additionally, many species of oysters are remarkable for their ability to change sex, as they are protandrous alternating hermaphrodites, further ensuring the species’ resilience and long-term survival in coastal waters. 

Natural Predators and Environmental Challenges 

Despite their ecological importance, oysters face numerous natural threats that can impact their populations. Predators such as starfish, oyster drills, and green crabs can damage oyster reefs. Environmental stressors, including severe weather events, fluctuating temperatures, and harmful algal blooms like brown tide, also pose significant challenges to oyster survival. Diseases such as MSX (caused by the protozoan parasite Haplosporidium nelsoni) have particularly affected Eastern oysters, though they pose no risk to humans. To combat diseases like MSX, oyster sets have been initiated with individuals resistant to MSX. 

These environmental pressures highlight the delicate balance oysters must maintain within their natural habitat, emphasizing the need for ongoing conservation and stewardship efforts to protect these vital creatures. 

The Tradition of “R” Months: A Historical and Modern Practice 

The tradition of eating oysters only during months containing the letter “R” dates back to at least the late 16th century. In his 1599 work Dyets Dry Dinner, Henry Buttes cautioned that oysters were more prone to spoilage during the warmer months, when they were likely to spawn. Warmer water temperatures also increased the risk of harmful algal blooms, such as red tide, which could produce toxins harmful to humans. When overfishing became a concern in the 19th century, restrictions like the “R” month rule allowed time for repopulation. 

What began as a precautionary measure eventually evolved into a cultural tradition. Today, modern farming techniques—such as refrigeration and the development of triploid oysters (sterile oysters that spawn less frequently)—have made oysters available year-round. Most oyster farms now operate in colder waters, where they can better control the oyster life cycle, ensuring a more consistent and sustainable harvest. 

Oysters in the Modern Era: Ecological and Economic Powerhouses 

Despite advances in technology and farming techniques, oysters remain as vital to our ecosystems and economies today as they have been for centuries. In regions like Long Island, where oyster farming is a cornerstone of the local industry, these bivalves continue to drive economic activity while providing invaluable ecological services. Beyond their culinary appeal, oysters play a critical role in water filtration, shoreline stabilization, and the creation of habitats for other marine life. 

Long Island’s East and West Bays provide a striking example of the delicate balance necessary for optimal oyster growth. The East Bay, sheltered by the barrier beach of Fire Island, is influenced by freshwater streams, lowering its salinity and providing ideal conditions for young oysters. In this brackish environment, natural predators, such as the oyster drill, are less abundant, allowing the oysters to thrive. However, the lower salinity also presents challenges for oyster maturation, making it harder for young oysters to reach harvestable size. 

In contrast, the West Bay, which is open to the more saline waters of the Atlantic Ocean, provides a more favorable environment for mature oysters. The higher salinity promotes faster growth and larger oysters, but it also increases the presence of predators. This contrast between the two bays has profound implications for local oyster farming, influencing both the ecological sustainability and economic output of the region. 

The Shape, Size, and Taste of Oysters 

Oysters vary widely in shape, size, and flavor, with these characteristics shaped largely by their growing conditions. Wild oysters, growing naturally, often have irregular, asymmetrical shells influenced by environmental factors such as water movement, substrate type, and local ecosystems. These oysters are prized for their complexity and variability, with flavors that can shift dramatically based on location. For example, wild oysters may have a more “minerally” or “briny” taste, depending on the salinity of the water—whether from a salty bay or a brackish river estuary. Some even carry distinct “seaweed” or “algae” notes, reflecting the local marine life. 

In contrast, farmed oysters are cultivated in controlled aquaculture systems and typically have more uniform, symmetrical shells. This consistency is achieved through techniques like rotating or “tumbling” the oysters to prevent them from attaching too firmly to the substrate, resulting in smooth, round shells. Farmed oysters generally grow larger and reach market size (typically 3 to 4 inches) more consistently. However, they tend to have thinner shells and less plump meat compared to wild oysters, due to the controlled growing conditions. Farmed oysters don’t face the same environmental stressors, such as strong currents, and therefore expend less energy filtering food, resulting in less dense meat. 

The most noticeable difference between wild and farmed oysters is their flavor. As filter feeders, oysters absorb the water around them, so their taste is influenced by the salinity, temperature, and plankton availability in their environment. Wild oysters, with their more variable conditions, have a more complex and diverse flavor profile, while farmed oysters offer more consistency. However, modern farming techniques can enhance flavors by manipulating salinity or nutrient levels to produce a more briny or intense taste. 

While wild oysters’ flavors can vary dramatically based on local water conditions, farmed oysters are generally more stable, though subtle differences may still arise due to variations in salinity, temperature, and farm location. Some farms even selectively breed oysters to achieve particular flavor profiles, giving farmed oysters a level of predictability and control that wild oysters cannot match. 

In the end, both wild and farmed oysters offer unique culinary experiences. Wild oysters are valued for their complexity, variability, and the influence of their natural environment on their taste, while farmed oysters provide consistency and can be manipulated to achieve specific flavor profiles. Whether you prefer the unpredictable richness of wild oysters or the reliable taste of farmed varieties, both have a place on the table, shaped by their environment and the methods used to cultivate them. 

Oysters: A Nutrient-Packed Superfood 

In addition to their ecological benefits, oysters are a nutritional powerhouse. Rich in protein, healthy fats, and a range of essential vitamins and minerals, oysters are a highly beneficial addition to any diet. A 3.5-ounce (100-gram) serving of oysters provides more than 100% of the recommended daily intake of vitamin B12, zinc, and copper, along with notable amounts of selenium, iron, and manganese. They are also an excellent source of omega-3 fatty acids, which support heart health, reduce inflammation, and boost brain function. 

Low in calories but high in protein, oysters offer a balanced, nutrient-dense food choice. Furthermore, they are an environmentally sustainable seafood option, requiring minimal inputs such as feed or fertilizers. This makes oysters a smart choice for those seeking both health benefits and a minimal ecological footprint. 

Oysters: A Fundamental Resource 

Oysters are far more than just a culinary delight—they are essential to the health of coastal ecosystems and a critical source of nourishment worldwide. The delicate balance between salinity, predator pressures, and environmental factors has shaped the oyster’s role in both local ecosystems and global markets. By continuing to understand and preserve the conditions that allow oysters to thrive, we can ensure that these remarkable shellfish remain an ecological and culinary treasure for generations to come. 

As a cornerstone of both ecology and economy, oysters are a resource that we must continue to manage sustainably, ensuring that they enrich both the environment and the livelihoods of those who depend on them. 

Did you know? 

  • In 1908, New York State passed a law restricting the sale of Blue Point oysters to those cultivated specifically in the waters of Great South Bay in Suffolk County. 

Methods of Shucking Oysters 

Shucking oysters is an art that has evolved over centuries. While the fundamental technique remains unchanged, different methods have emerged, each catering to specific purposes, whether for commercial efficiency or aesthetic presentation. Indigenous peoples, such as the Algonquians of Long Island, were among the first to enjoy oysters, preparing them in various ways, from raw to steamed and fire-roasted. These early methods continue to influence modern practices, celebrating the versatility of oysters as a food source. 

Over time, several shucking techniques have developed, including the side knife method, the stabber (or sticker) method, and the cracking or breaking method. Each method has its advantages and is suited to different settings, whether for speed, ease, or presentation quality. 

In the modern era, a straightforward technique has become the standard for both commercial and home shuckers. The oyster is held in the non-dominant hand, with the pointed end facing out. The knife is inserted into the hinge at a low angle, and with a gentle twist, the oyster opens. The top shell is then removed, and the oyster is freed by cutting the lower muscle. This efficient method preserves the oyster’s delicate texture and flavor, ensuring a clean presentation for the consumer. 

Favorite Old-World Recipes 

 

Oysters in White Wine a la Gardiner’s Island 

6 doz deep sea oysters 

½ cup dry white wine 

1pt. heavy cream 

3 tablespoons flower 

3 tablespoons butter  

¼ teaspoon cayenne  

Salt 

Cook oysters in their own liquor, boiling for just two minutes. Strain. Reduce liquid to half quantity. Melt butter, stir in flower, add liquid, cream, wine, a little salt and the cayenne. Fold oysters in gently. Serve with hot buttered toast. Enough for a party-halve the recipe for family dinner.  

 

Oyster Stew (As made at the Grand Central Terminal Oyster Bar.) 

For each portion, use eight to ten oysters. Melt a teaspoon of butter in a deep pan over a hot fire. As butter liquefies, pour in the oysters with whatever of their own liquid remains. Season quickly with a dash of Worcestershire sauce, ½ teaspoon celery salt and liberal dashes of salt, black pepper and paprika. As oysters simmer, more liquid will emerge from them. When the juice begins to boil and the edges of the oysters curl, add ½ pint of milk. Stir gently and leave on the fire until the milk is just beginning to boil. DO NOT PERMIT FULL BOILING. Pour the stew into a deep bowl, drop in ½ teaspoon of butter and dust paprika over the surface. Serve at once with oyster crackers. Make each portion separately if convenient, but not more than two or three servings at a time.  

 

Oyster Souffle 

1 tablespoon butter 

1 tablespoon flower 

1 tablespoon chopped parsley 

1 cup milk 

1cup oysters (which have been rolled in cracker crumbs and fied, or use  

leftover fried oysters)  

½ teaspoon salt 

10 drops onion juice 

3 eggs separated 

Make white sauce with butter, flower and milk; add seasonings, beaten yolks of eggs and the fried oysters (diced of whole if very small oysters). Heat for a minute or two and then cool. When cool, add stiffly beaten whites of eggs, pour into a buttered baking dish and bake for 35 minutes at 350 deg. F. Serves 6.  

Part 1: The History and Legacy of Oystering on Long Island: From Suffolk County to Modern Restoration

The History and Legacy of Oystering on Long Island: From Suffolk County to Modern Restoration 

Long Island’s rich maritime history is deeply intertwined with its oyster industry, which has shaped both the cultural and economic landscape of the region for centuries. At the heart of this story lies Orient, the easternmost hamlet on Long Island’s North Fork. Originally founded in 1640 as part of Southold and named Poquatuck by the indigenous Algonquian peoples, the area’s proximity to abundant oyster beds led to its eventual renaming as Oyster Ponds. The fertile lands, sheltered harbors, and rich shellfish resources quickly attracted settlers—primarily fishermen, farmers, and tradespeople—who recognized the region’s unique natural bounty. In 1836, the village formally adopted the name “Orient” after its post office, as “Oyster Ponds” was deemed too similar to the nearby Oyster Bay. 

The settlement’s origins date back to 1640, when thirteen men, led by Reverend John Youngs, established their community. Among them was John Tuthill, whose family legacy continues to this day. Through my research at the Mystic Seaport Museum, I was introduced to Orient Point and the Tuthill family, whose deep-rooted connection to the land and waters has been passed down for generations. In 2003, the Tuthills founded the Oysterponds Shellfish Company, continuing a tradition of shellfishing that dates back to the early 1800s, when commercial fishing first took hold in the region. 

This article is part one of three and explores the evolution of the oyster industry, beginning with my visit to Orient Point—still affectionately known as Oysterponds by locals—and examining how oystering has shaped Long Island’s history, economy, and culture. To provide further context, I will first share the mission of the Long Island Collection at the Mystic Seaport Museum and how my research has uncovered the intertwined histories of Long Island’s industries. 

Early Colonial Oystering and Indigenous Contributions 

Before European settlers arrived, Indigenous peoples—particularly the Algonquians of Long Island—relied on oysters and other shellfish as a vital food source. Anthropologist Allison McGovern notes that these communities maintained a foraging lifestyle, dependent on marine and estuarine resources for thousands of years. They taught early settlers how to harvest and prepare oysters and other shellfish, laying the foundation for a thriving industry that would later define the region. 

Settlement on Long Island progressed from east to west by the English and from west to east by the Dutch. The two groups met at what is now Oyster Bay. Early English settlements included Gardiner’s Island (1639), Southold (1640), Shelter Island, East Hampton (1648), Oyster Bay (1653), Brookhaven (1655), Smithtown (1665), and Islip (1683). The Montaukett, part of the Algonquian Nation, inhabited much of Long Island’s eastern regions until the early 1600s, before European settlement. 

The influence of Dutch settlers on Long Island’s maritime industries is still evident today. Over time, various immigrant groups contributed their expertise, further shaping the region’s maritime economy. Portuguese immigrants in Port Washington became renowned for their skills in eeling and clamming, while Dutch settlers shared their knowledge of fishing. By the 19th century, Irish, German, Portuguese, and Spanish immigrants had added to the cultural and economic diversity of the area, creating a truly global maritime community. 

The Growth of the Oyster Industry into the 20th Century 

By the late 19th century, Long Island had become a dominant force in the North American oyster trade. As historian Kochiss writes, “New York State has consistently outproduced Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts in marketable oysters. By the 1880s, New York City had become the center of the northern oyster industry, leading the country in overseas and transcontinental oyster shipments.” Oysters poured into New York markets from New England, Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay, and, most significantly, from Long Island’s own waters, including Staten Island, City Island, Raritan Bay, and nearly every inlet and bay on Long Island. 

In the Great South Bay, oystering evolved from a communal resource to a more regulated, commercial activity. Initially, New York and New Jersey implemented conservation measures to protect oyster populations, such as restricting harvest seasons. By the 19th century, demand for oysters had soared—not only as a food source but also as a sought-after commodity. 

The industry was highly mobile, with baymen—local fishermen—harvesting young oysters, called “seed oysters,” from the East Bay, where lower salinity and fewer predators provided an ideal environment for oyster larvae. These seed oysters were then moved to the West Bay, where saltier waters allowed them to grow to marketable sizes. Oystering became a cold-weather business, with harvesting typically taking place between September and April to avoid overharvesting. 

By the mid-19th century, Long Island’s oyster industry was thriving, especially around Sayville in the Great South Bay. For many landowners and farmers, oystering became a lucrative winter activity, providing extra income during the off-season. Oysters and other shellfish harvested from the bay became vital to both the local economy and the New York City market. Dutch immigrants played an essential role in this expansion, bringing their expertise to Long Island’s oyster farms. 

One significant turning point came in 1884, when New York State passed a law granting Suffolk County rights to submerged lands for oyster cultivation. This legal framework paved the way for the expansion of commercial oyster farming. The introduction of oysters from Virginia helped rejuvenate the industry, which had been severely depleted by overfishing and pollution. 

The establishment of Blue Point oysters as a commercial staple further cemented Long Island’s reputation as a premier oyster producer. By the late 19th century, wild oyster populations had dwindled, prompting the rise of aquaculture practices and the development of sustainable farming methods. Oysters became so abundant that they were consumed by both the wealthy and the working class in New York City, often sold in street-side carts: “For a time, it seemed oysters were an inexhaustible resource.” 

Despite the success, the industry faced challenges in the early 20th century, including outbreaks of typhoid fever and gastrointestinal diseases linked to contaminated oysters. Though later studies showed that oysters were rarely the source of these diseases, the stigma persisted, and the industry suffered further setbacks due to pollution and overfishing. 

The Rise and Decline of the Northern Oyster Industry 

In 1924, outbreaks of typhoid fever linked to raw shellfish from polluted waters further damaged the industry. While government regulations were introduced to improve processing and handling standards, the damage was done. The oyster industry began to shrink as larger corporate enterprises dominated, pushing smaller, independent oystermen out of business. By the early 20th century, labor costs, pollution, and competition from other regions had taken their toll on the smaller, local oyster farms. 

As Kochiss notes, “Frequent set failures and labor costs forced many companies out of business. To survive, some concerns combined resources, over the cries of ‘monopoly’ from smaller, independent oystermen.” By the mid-20th century, oysters had lost some of their popularity, particularly in the wake of the industry’s public health concerns. 

Refocusing on Oyster Ponds: A Modern Revival 

The decline of the industry in the early 20th century set the stage for a new chapter in oystering on Long Island. The revival of the oyster industry today focuses not just on commercial interests but also on environmental restoration. Oysters play a crucial role in maintaining healthy coastal ecosystems. The Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) can filter up to 50 gallons of water per day, helping to improve water quality and prevent harmful algal blooms. Furthermore, oyster reefs provide critical habitats for various marine life, including fish, crabs, and invertebrates. 

Oysters are also a nutrient-packed food, rich in protein, omega-3 fatty acids, and essential vitamins and minerals. As Dolaskie explains, the tradition of eating oysters during months with an “R” in their name goes back to 1599, when it was common advice to avoid raw oysters during the summer months due to bacterial risks surrounding the inability to keep the shellfish cold. Today, 90 percent of oyster farms operate in colder waters, allowing for a year-round harvest. 

Oystering on Long Island is more than just a commercial industry; it’s a cultural heritage, a connection to the land, and a keystone of environmental health. The future of Long Island’s oysters hinges on sustainable practices, scientific innovation, and a growing commitment to environmental restoration. As we look to the future, the legacy of oyster harvesting remains deeply embedded in Long Island’s communities—from the historic waters of Orient Point to the modern farms scattered along the island’s shores.

Charle’s Hervey Townshend’s Double Reflecting and Repeating Circle

In a recently completed review of over 3,000 Curatorial accession files, funded by a grant awarded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, Museum staff discovered that we have a rare navigation instrument, a “Townshend Double Reflecting and Repeating Circle.” 

A reflecting circle is a device for measuring longitude that was more accurate than the sextant. It was developed in the 18th century in England and refined by French and German instrument makers in the first half of the 19th centuryHenri-Prudence Gambey (1787-1847) was the foremost precision instrument maker in France and made devices for physicists, astronomers, surveyors and navigators, among othersWhile the reflecting circle was not generally favored in England, on the Continent (and French navy) it was used well into the 1800s to measure large angles with great accuracy.  In the reflecting circle, mirrors were used to measure simultaneously the angular distance between two objects to establish longitude. 

Our instrument was made by Charles Hervey Townshend (1833-1904), both a ships’ captain and an inventorHisTownshend Double Reflecting and Repeating Circle, for which he was granted a patent in 1888, was a valuable aid to maritime navigation with respect to longitude and latitude.  With it one can sight three objects and measure two angular separations simultaneously, for example, two bright stars from the moon for the lunar longitude method, or three coastal landmarks for triangulation in coastal navigation. His experiments with oyster culture after he retired from the sea were of singular importance in the development of that industry.

Written by Dr. Paul Goodwin, IMLS Project Volunteer, 2024

 

Pop-Up Exhibit in the G.W. Blunt White Library: The Snow Baby’s Mother

In a recently completed review of over 3,000 Curatorial accession files, funded by a grant awarded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, materials related to Josephine Diebitsch Peary (1863 – 1955) have been revealed. Josephine Diebitsch Peary, the focus of these cases, had previously been referenced in files and records as the wife of Admiral Robert E. Peary, a well-known American explorer whose Arctic accomplishments, including being the first to reach the North Pole (contested by some), are well documented and supported by Museum collection objects and manuscript materials. The information in the files recognizes Peary as a mother, author, and Arctic adventurer in her own right.

Objects in this pop-up exhibit are presented as examples of Arctic and Greenlandic culture. Most have never before been exhibited.  All are examples of objects mentioned in Diebitsch Peary’s books. 

Curated by Dr. Paul Goodwin, Project Volunteer, and Nancy Seager, Project Archivist, 2024

Fiddler : What’s In a Name?

Question: What’s in a Name? 

Answer:  Quite a bit, it turns out, as in the case of a prize vessel in the Museum’s watercraft collection, Fiddler (MSM #1959.1266) an early Buzzard’s Bay 15’ Class designed in 1898 by Nathanael G. Herreshoff. The Herreshoff name alone would call attention.  

In a recently completed review of over 4,000 Curatorial accession files, funded by a grant awarded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services, Fiddler’s file raised a question. Every file for every collection object includes a document transferring legal ownership to the Museum and for Fiddler naturally included a physical description as well as known provenance. Additionally, almost as an afterthought, the owner added a single sentence, stating that Fiddler was raced in the early 1900’s by his mother, a name omitted. Obviously important to the history of the vessel and necessary to provide as complete a record as possible, the omission could not stand. In museum-speak, this is called ‘pulling on the string.’   

Research quickly recognized Caroline Miller Dabney, mother of the donor as the woman who raced Fiddler to victory with her ‘petticoat crew’ in women’s racing regattas in the waters of Buzzards Bay, 1901-1906. 

Contemporary newspapers accounts of races in the Bay also listed the Herreshoff 25’ Terrapin, raced by her father, Lewis S. Dabney, often winning on the same day! 


MSM 1960.348 shows Fiddler, number E-11, skippered by Miss Caroline Dabney and her all-women crew. The Herreshoff 15 was a one design class with a knockabout rig, 24’ x 15’ x 6’9” x 2’3”The Buzzards Bay 15 Class were delivered to members of the Beverly Yacht Club in Marion, Massachusetts, for the summer of the racing season of 1899They were known as the E-Class at the Beverly Yacht ClubPrinted along the top edge of the print:  “Miss Caroline Dabney racing with her “petticoat crew”, 1901 – 1903.   

Further pulling on the Dabney string played out not only with rewarding connections between Fiddler and women in the world of racing and yachting but also to other Dabney family members and further links within the Museum collection.  And unexpectedly, a final tug revealed ties between the Dabney family name and the far-flung history of American whaling, a subject immanently well suited for further research in Museum resources; Records of the Holmes’ Shipyard, Manuscripts Collection 46, Dabney & Cunningham; the Kermit Family Collection, Manuscripts Collection 68, Dabney, John B.; the Records of N. & W.W. Billings, Manuscripts Collection 233, Dabney, C.H. and Dabney, Charles W.. 

 To this day, the Dabney family is credited with a cultural and historical heritage still visible on the island through publications and online by organizations such as the Portuguese Historical Museum (portuguesemuseum.org), the Massachusetts Historical Society (the Dabney family papers, diaries and letters), the American-Portuguese Genealogical and Historical Society, Inc., and the Dabney’s House Museum run by the Regional Government of Azores, in Faial. The first U.S. consulate was established in the Azores in 1795 by George Washington and from 1806 – 1892 that diplomatic post was headed by three generations of the Dabney family. In 1806, John Bass Dabney of Boston was appointed Consul by President Thomas Jefferson and settled in Faial (Fayal), where he built the estate “Bagatelle” (the name of a Herreshoff yacht as well, owned by George Dabney). Eight Dabney-owned vessels and a chandlery promoted commerce between the Azores and the East Coast, even providing support to vessels during the Civil War.  

 While pulling on this particular string may not be completely finished, the file for Fiddler now incorporates new information, extended links and broader context and information about Caroline Miller Dabney Parker.   

To that point: “History can never be truthfully presented if the presentation is purely emotional. It can never be truthfully or usefully presented unless profound research, patient laborious, painstaking, has preceded the presentation.” So said Theodore Roosevelt. 

Written by Nancy Seager, Project Archivist, 2024

 

 

 

Curatorial Files Centennial Decade Preservation & Access Project

The Curatorial Files Centennial Decade Preservation and Access Project at Mystic Seaport Museum, funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) 2020-2024, was an initiative aimed at preserving and making accessible at-risk primary source materials and artifacts that had been inadvertently hidden for decades within the Museum’s Curatorial accession files.

The files, dating back to 1930, house an extraordinary and significant body of material documenting the curatorial holdings of America’s largest maritime museum. The materials within these files, and the extensive collection they represent, play a crucial role in enhancing our understanding and appreciation of the American maritime experience. The project focused on the files from 1930 to 1960, a period during which professional collections management and archival staffing at the Museum were limited.

As the project progressed, a number of manuscripts but very few artifacts were discovered. However, it successfully met the IMLS grant’s goal of preserving at-risk objects and improving access to key data, much of which had been hidden within the files. This previously unrecorded information included a wealth of details about people, vessels, subjects, and institutional history, all of which are now accessible to staff through the creation of a comprehensive finding aid.

This initiative also brought to light previously overlooked individuals, subjects, and vessels, thereby expanding the scope and impact of the Museum’s collection. In addition to the finding aid, the project discoveries led to new collections management system entries, updated records, and enhanced provenance and contextual information. This work has facilitated cross-referencing and the inclusion of new details or corrections to object records.

Notable findings and stories from the files are shared on this site.

Fiddler : What’s In a Name?

Pop-Up Exhibit in the G.W. Blunt White Library: The Snow Baby’s Mother

Charle’s Hervey Townshend’s Double Reflecting and Repeating Circle

An Ocean Liner Sampler

We have  posted a number of items over the last two years pertaining to an extraordinary collection that was given to the Museum a few years ago. This collection of ocean liner ephemera entails nearly 10,000 items and will be a great source of exhibit and research material for the Museum for years to come. A number of people have been involved in cataloging and digitizing the collection, and one member of the staff has created descriptions for a sampling of what appears in the collection. You can see that sampling through this link.

A Nautical Novelty: Dr. Seuss’ Navy

Theodor Seuss Geisel, better known to all as Dr. Seuss, the beloved children’s book author and illustrator, began his career as cartoonist for Vanity Fair, Life and other publications before moving into advertising; most notably for Standard Oil, the parent company of Esso Marine Oil and Lubricants.

As ad man for Esso, Seuss created a menagerie of sea-dwelling creatures and a host of mariner characters that appear in numerous advertisements in boating publications such as Yachting and Motor Boating. Captain Taylor, a mariner who often dispensed tongue-in-cheek boating advice, and perhaps the most well-known of the characters, is seen here adorning a roving advertisement for Burr’s Yacht Station (New London, CT) during the Harvard-Yale Rowing Race in June of 1935. MSM Rosenfeld Collection. Acc. # 1984.187.71507F

When asked to create a campaign for Esso Marine Lube for the 1936 New York International [Motor] Boat Show, Seuss and his colleagues created 15 certificates stating that the selectee had been named an Admiral in Seuss’ Navy. The inductees, especially in the beginning, were celebrity boaters like Vincent Astor. The aim, much like today’s advertising campaigns, was to attach the Esso Marine brand to the celebrity, “If it’s good enough for [celebrity], it’s got to be good.” The campaign was supposed to be somewhat in jest, but the selectees hung their certificates up in their yachts and soon everyone wanted to be part of Seuss’ Navy, where every man was an Admiral. Certificate: MSM Acc. # 1988.107.35

With growing interest in becoming a member of Seuss’ Navy, the simple ad campaign became a full-fledged feature at the shows. Seuss’ Navy was deemed the “Fun-Makers” and sponsored boat races, games, contests, and hosted an annual “Seuss Navy Luncheon and Frolic” MSM Rosenfeld Collection. Acc. # 1984.187.85312F.

Esso marketers and salesmen even put on short plays created by Seuss. In one of Seuss’ “Little Dramas of the Deep,” “The demon sludge fish is the villain… an enlightening story for those embryo mariners who would gamble on lubricants…”- a big hit.

Seuss went on to create three 30-page Seuss Navy story booklets – with rhyming text. Seuss later said his experience working at Standard Oil taught him “conciseness and how to marry pictures with words.” Seuss published his first children’s book in 1937.

The Navy sank by 1949 as a result of what Seuss claims was a “casualty of its own commercialism.”

Esso Marine Advertisements

Emily Mayotte

And the Band Plays on… in Mystic Seaport’s Collections

2020.39.7177 A photograph of the Titanic leaving Southampton, part of the Witherill Collection.

by Michelle Turner

 The Titanic is so much a part of our collective memory and pop culture that the simple phrase “the band played on” may be enough to bring a lump to your throat. In the midst of a terrible disaster, on a cold and chaotic deck in the North Atlantic, the eight musicians of the ship’s band played ragtime songs and hymns, hoping to calm and soothe the people around them. Everything we know about those final moments comes to us from the memories of survivors. Many of them remembered being in their lifeboats and hearing music floating across the calm water as they rowed away. They remembered the music ending as the ship sank, replaced by the screams of people in the water.

A Carpathia discovery

We have been cataloging a collection of ocean liner materials donated by collector Linda Witherill, which includes many remarkable items directly connected to the Titanic and the disaster. But recently we discovered another small but chilling bit of the story hidden in a concert program.

2020.39.7607 Programme of Grand Concert, from the Witherill Collection.

This is a program from a shipboard concert on the Carpathia, the ship that became famous for its heroic rescue of the 700 or so survivors of the Titanic after it sank on April 15, 1912. What you might notice first is the beautiful floral decoration. Then you might notice the date, February 20, 1912. And if you happen to know more about the Titanic’s story, you might notice the names of Roger Bricoux and William Theo Bailey. They were members of Carpathia’s band, but about a month and a half after this concert, they both signed up for the new band formed for the Titanic’s maiden voyage. (1) Like all of the Titanic’s musicians, they died in the disaster.

On this “Grand Concert” program, from the Carpathia’s February cruise from New York to the Mediterranean, the two of them are listed along with Edgar Heap, bandmaster and violinist. They played two classical pieces together. Theo Brailey, who also accompanied the other performers on piano, was 25 years old. Roger Bricoux, 23 years old, played the cello. Mystic Seaport Museum has recently acquired this incredible original photograph of Roger Bricoux.

2022.51 Photograph of Roger Bricoux, a new acquisition

 The Carpathia trip was Bricoux’s first time working as a musician at sea. On March 4, a few days after this concert, he mailed his parents a letter telling them about the trip: “The voyage is marvelous. We left Liverpool on February 10th and passed through Gibraltar, Tangier, Algeria, Malta, Alexandria, and Constantinople, then… Trieste, Fiume, Naples and finally New York. I assure you that it is splendid. We had a storm but I wasn’t at all sea sick. I was amazed.” On March 18, he wrote another letter telling them he would be joining the Titanic.

Back in New York on March 29, Bricoux and Brailey met with Wallace Hartley, the Titanic’s bandmaster, for the first time, and the three of them travelled back to England on the Mauretania. On April 10, the three boarded the Titanic, meeting up with the five other musicians, John Wesley Woodward, Jock Hume, John Clarke, Georges Krins and Percy Taylor.

Personal connections to the Titanic musicians.

The other performers listed on our Carpathia program were crew members. Because many of them were still on board the ship at the time of the famous rescue, we happen to know a lot about them. Captain Arthur Rostron was in attendance. Edward Henry Hughes, singing a baritone aria and songs, was the Chief Steward. Seventh Engineer Douglas Hamilton Colquhoun performed humorous songs. “Mr. J. Barker” may be James William Barker, an Assistant Storekeeper. (2)

2020.39.7436 Postcard from Witherill Collection

2020.39.7445 Postcard from the Witherill Collection

On the night of the Titanic rescue, James Barker grabbed his camera. The pictures he took, reproduced on these postcards in the Witherill collection, represent almost the only photographic evidence from that terrible night.(3)

It is chilling to realize that crew members on the Carpathia had personal connections to people on the Titanic, had shared a stage with these two talented young musicians. When the Carpathia arrived on the scene at 4 am, after steaming at top speed, they expected to find a badly damaged ship, but all they found were 20 lifeboats in an icy sea. Not until the first survivors were brought aboard did they fully realize that the Titanic had sunk at 2:20 a.m.

What did the band play?

Our collection also gives us some hints about the music. This dance card from the Carpathia, from June 6, 1912, is an indication of what was popular at the time.

2020.39.7616 Programme of Dance, June 6, 1912, from the Witherill Collection   

As for the Titanic, there is lively debate about what exactly the band played and especially about the last song they played. (4) Some survivors remembered dance music, and others clearly remembered them playing the hymn “Nearer My God to Thee.” Wallace Hartley, the bandmaster, had once told a friend that if he ever found himself on a sinking ship he would play “Nearer my God to Thee,” and that hymn became firmly associated with the disaster in the public’s mind, as these postcards from the time show.

2020.39.7262(left) and 2020.39.7265(right) Two of a set of Bamforth & Co. commemorative postcards in the Witherill Collection. 

However, one survivor remembered that the last thing they played was a song he called “Autumn,” which might have been a hymn but might have been a reference to the beautiful waltz “Songe d’Automne.” Poignantly, that very waltz is the first selection on the Carpathia’s dance program.

We’ve created a Spotify playlist with a taste of the music from these objects and from the disaster.

TITANIC Playlist

For much more detail about the musicians and the music, we recommend the book “The Band That Played On: The Extraordinary Story of the 8 Musicians who Went Down with the TITANIC” by author Steve Turner

END NOTES

(1)  The Carpathia was a Cunard Line ship, while the Titanic was a White Star Line ship. However, band members were not officially employees of the line. They worked for a company that contracted musicians to all of the steamers. Each line had standard books of music that musicians were expected to know and be able to play at the request of passengers.

(2) Barker was listed as playing a “phonofiddle.” This was an instrument that was briefly popular in the early 20th century, with a neck like a violin, but with a trumpet like a phonograph rather than a traditional violin body.

(3) At least two passengers took photographs as well, and there is some confusion as the photographs that these postcards attribute to Barker have sometimes been attributed to passenger Louis Mansfield Ogden.

(4) It is also unclear what instrument the pianist Brailey would have been playing, but author Steve Turner notes that he played multiple instruments, so perhaps he picked up something else to play that night.

 

 

 

 

Women’s History on the QUEEN ELIZABETH

In my work researching materials from the Witherill Collection, a collection of documents and objects relating to the grand ocean liners of the 20th century, it has often been frustrating trying to learn more about women’s stories. The passenger lists we have are full of interesting and accomplished men and, no doubt women, but even the women who seem to be traveling without a husband are often identified only by their husbands’ name or initials. Sometimes, though, a woman passenger does stand out for her title or her name.

A wonderful example is this passenger list for the QUEEN ELIZABETH’s voyage departing New York on September 18, 1947 for Southampton, England. It is full of interesting men: Allen W. Dulles, the future director of the CIA; H.S.M. Burns, the president of the Shell Oil Company; Dr. Hajo Holborn, Yale professor of history; Dr. Otto Stern, a Nobel Prize winning physicist at the Carnegie Institute of Technology in Pittsburgh; Harvard philosopher Dr. Ralph Barton Perry. There are also a number of Congressmen listed, including John Davis Lodge, who later became the governor of Connecticut. Clearly, it was a post-war moment when Americans were eagerly embracing European travel again.

But there, at the bottom of the first page of names, is “Congresswoman Frances Boulton.” On further investigation, it turns out that this 1947 voyage represented both a turning point in U.S. history and a milestone for women in politics.

Frances Payne Bolton (the passenger list misspells it) was Ohio’s first Congresswoman and one of just a handful of women in the House of Representatives. Born in Cleveland, Ohio, she was an heiress to the Standard Oil fortune, making her one of the richest women in America. Her husband, Chester Castle Bolton, was the Congressman for Ohio’s 22nd District, and when he passed away, Frances Payne Bolton ran in the special election for his seat. This was often how women managed to get a foothold in politics in this time period. The men who encouraged her to run for her husband’s office thought she would serve out his term and then retire from politics. Instead, she continued to serve and win elections for 28 years.

Congresswoman Frances Bolton. Wikimedia Commons.

In the fall of 1947, Congress sent many of its members on fact-finding missions abroad. It was a crucial moment: the US had emerged from World War II as a new superpower, with parts of western Europe in ruins, while the USSR seemed to be engaged in a power grab. The world’s hunger for Middle Eastern oil was clear, and the United Nations was attempting to resolve a fiery situation in British Palestine.

By this time, Frances Bolton was a seasoned member of Congress and served on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. In the fall of 1947, as chair of a subcommittee studying the situation in the Near East, she made history, becoming the first woman ever to lead a Congressional delegation. On October 4, she and her colleague Congressman Chester E. Merrow of New Hampshire arrived in Jerusalem to meet with all parties. This September 18 passenger list is from their trip over to England, before continuing on to Jerusalem.

Bolton and Merrow issued a report in early 1948 about what they had seen and heard. Their report back to the Committee on Foreign Affairs includes a paragraph about their voyage on the QUEEN ELIZABETH and how it helped shape their experience.

Already 55 years old when she was first elected, Frances Bolton threw herself into her public service and into the minute details of foreign policy. At a time when many women’s lives are barely visible in the historical record, she went on fact-gathering voyages, wrote reports and gave speeches that were instrumental in forming American understandings of the post-war world, of the Communist threat, and of policy towards the Middle East and Africa.

Michelle Turner, IMLS Cataloging Supervisor

 

References and Further Reading:

https://www.womenshistory.org/education-resources/biographies/frances-bolton

https://clevelandhistorical.org/items/show/678

Committee on Foreign Affairs. House. National and International Movements. Report of Hon. Frances P. Bolton, Ohio and Hon. Chester E. Merrow, N.H. Relative to the Near East (and other Points Visited). Jan. 1, 1948. 80th Congress. https://li.proquest.com/elhpdf/histcontext/CMP-1948-FOA-0033.pdf

Bolton, Frances P. The Strategy and Tactics of World Communism: Report [of] Subcommittee No. 5, National and International Movements, with Supplement I, One Hundred Years of Communism, 1848-1948, and Supplement II, Official Protests of the United States Government Against Communist Policies or Actions, and Related Correspondence. [July 1945-Dec. 1947]. United States: U.S. Government Print., Office, 1948. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Strategy_and_Tactics_of_World_Commun/_Kk3AAAAIAAJ?hl=en

The Life of Frances Payne Bolton https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I3EfHHlPYw

 

Early 19th-Century Neutral Trade Documents at Mystic Seaport Museum

Two small collections of papers in the G.W. Blunt White Library illuminate how United States merchantmen trading with Europe faced many obstacles during the early 19th century as continual warfare convulsed the continent.  France’s emperor, Napoleon Bonaparte, issued the so-called Berlin Decree in 1806 that tried to blockade any trade, including that of neutral nations, with Britain. The British responded with a policy that allowed neutral ships to trade with the Continent only if they first touched at British ports, discharged their cargoes and paid a tax for an export license. In response, Napoleon then issued the Milan Decrees in 1807 that ordered that any ships that had touched British ports before sailing into French, or its allies’ territorial waters, be seized and condemned.

Neutral shipping, most importantly that of the United States, faced the dilemma of being seized by the Royal Navy if they failed to touch on a British port and pay the tax before proceeding to the Continent, or seized by the French or its allies if they did. This was the difficult situation faced by the United States ship Commerce in 1806 and 1807, and the merchant vessel North America and 26 other vessels in 1809-1810.

George III safe passage document issued to Brig COMMERCE that proved to be ineffectual.

In the first case, the Commerce sailed from Boston to Lisbon with a cargo of grain and merchandise. Cognizant of the dangers of carrying on trade in a wartime environment, the Commerce first made landfall in England and secured from the Government of George III a safe passage document.  The ship proceeded to Lisbon without further incident and loaded a new cargo for Antwerp.  Twice on the voyage British ships stopped the Commerce, but allowed it to proceed.  Intercepted for a third time, however, the ship was captured by another British naval vessel and taken to England where it was detained until its case was resolved.  The Commerce, and others, were caught in the confusing decrees and counter-decrees of the French and British.

In 1807 the Commerce once again set sail from Boston for Livorno, a customs free city in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany.  Upon leaving Livorno with a new cargo the ship was seized by a Russian privateer and taken to the Island of Corfu, where it was condemned.  Russia, of course, was at war with France.  It was determined that the Commerce had unwittingly taken on a cargo of wheat in Livorno that had originated in Naples, a satellite kingdom of Napoleon.  Legal proceedings taken against Russia by the United States in defense of American shipping dragged on until 1828 when the czar’s government agreed to pay an indemnity of 50,000 rubles.

In the case of the merchant vessel North America, in 1809 it was seized, captured and detained in Norway.  The Kingdom of Denmark and Norway (united from 1536-1814) had been allied with the French since 1807 which is why they intercepted and seized neutral shipping.  Court proceedings then determined if they had violated French decrees or if they were not in fact neutral vessels.  If the Danish court was satisfied with the vessel’s papers they were cleared to trade.  But if it was determined that they had touched at a British port or if the ships were not owned by a neutral country they were condemned and their ships and cargoes forfeited. The North America was one of 26 United States vessels detained in Norway at the time.  In this instance, letters regarding the seizure were written by Samuel Longfellow, uncle of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, to his father Stephen and his brother in Gorham, Maine and John Quincy Adams was enlisted in attempts to free the ships.

Letter addressed to Stephen Longfellow, grandfather of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, from H.W> Longfellow’s uncle Samuel in 1809.

These few instances allow an insight into the larger problem of neutral trade in wartime and the profound disruptions to commerce that ensued.

Thank you to Dr. Paul Goodwin, Library volunteer.

 

A New Shellback Crosses the Line

A crossing-the-line ceremony is something that many naval and merchant seamen have experienced. Traditionally, when a vessel passes over the equator, anyone aboard that is also crossing for the first time is initiated into the brotherhood of shellbacks by King Neptune himself, attended by his lovely court, of course. Duckings, being “shaved” with giant implements, dosing with some sort of medicinal potion and being smeared with tar are just some of the events that might take place during a mandatory appearance at the good King’s court. Nowadays, even certificates of such a graduation into the ranks are made available to the “lucky” inductee. Below is one such certificate from 1982 issued to the recipient by Neptunus Rex and Davey Jones.

However, the tradition is a long one going back centuries. Looking back, we find the accompanying image in a rare book in the G.W. Blunt White Library’s collection at Mystic Seaport. “Crossing the Line” is from A Picturesque Voyage to India : by the Way of China, by Thomas Daniell and William Daniell published in London in 1810. Imagine the surprise of the passengers aboard as Neptune himself makes an appearance on deck to welcome new members to his company.

The following transcript from a journal 76 years later, in 1886, lays out the scene in dramatic fashion as the naval ship makes its way across the equator in the Atlantic Ocean. The author and inductee,William E. Safford, an ensign aboard the USS VANDALIA, appeared in an earlier post. The manuscript journal is part of the collection of the G.W. Blunt White Library.

“Sept. 23 ‘86

Crossing the Equator.

As we were to “cross the line” preparations were made for receiving Neptune on board; and for initiating all those on board who had not been across the line before. At half past nine in the forenoon, a grotesque procession issued from under the top gallant forecastle, headed by an old man with a long white beard and hair, wearing on his head a glittering crown and bearing in his hand a trident.  He was all bedewed with the salty spray of the ocean from which he had just risen. Seated on a chariot drawn by ocean nymphs was his blushing bride Amphitrite whose fair curly locks were surmounted by a diadem.  In her arms she held little Rhodi, her baby, wrapped up in her sea-blue mantle to screen her from the vulgar gaze of mortal eyes. The royal couple were attended by their Lord High Chamberlain and in their wake followed the barber and hairdresser to his majesty, his court physician, four Knights of the bath, and a train of attendants.

They were received by the officer of the deck and the Executive officer on the weather side of the quarter deck; and a number of officers who had not before been in his Majesty’s realm were presented with imposing ceremonies to both the King and his royal spouse by the Lord High Chamberlain. As they expressed their appreciation of the honor conferred upon them, and begged his Majesty that he would deign still further to add to their happiness by accepting some slight refreshment for himself and his retinue after their long journey from their palace beneath the sea; the gracious sovereign not only accepted the hospitality tendered him, but presented the officers with the following credentials, headed by a portrait of his majesty sitting in a shell and drawn over the blue sea by a pair of classic dolphins:

“Our Realm surrounds the World”.

Latitude 00 00

Longitude 30 33 West.

Know all men by these presents that Ensign W.E. Safford, U.S.N. having crossed our Realm on board the U.S.S. “Vandalia” in the service of his country and for honorable purposes and having complied with all the usages rules and customs in so visiting us, he is now declared

“Free of the Ocean” Given under our hand in the Reign of wind and water on this the 23 day of September 1886.

(Signed) Neptune, Rex.

After giving us our diplomas, the procession continued on its way, stopping at the bridge on the lee-side (port) of the deck.  Here a throne had been erected for Neptune, Amphitrite remaining on her chariot with her baby in her arms.  Just forward of the bridge a reservoir had been constructed out of a large tarpaulin (an awning coated with tar) by stopping its margin up to a height of about four feet above the deck, and allowing it to sag down in the middle.  This was nearly filled with water.  Just off of this, to the right of the throne was a stool mounted on a box.

Those of the crew who had never before crossed the Equator were brought in succession before the throne.  Neptune waved them aside, and Amphitrite still seated on her chariot and with a pipe in her mouth, made them kiss the baby, whose face had been coated with a mixture of shoe-blacking and grease.

They were then seated in a chair where the court dentist examined their teeth with a huge pair of forceps and the court physician administered to them some physic from a bottle armed with a bunch of needles which stuck into their faces. They were then placed in the barbers chair on the margin of the pool; their faces were lathered with a disgusting black sticky mixture and then scraped by an enormous razor of wood. Suddenly they were tumbled heels over head into the pool and after having been held under for a short while by the Knights of the bath were allowed to clamber out, in the sorriest plight one could well imagine. Some of the victims went through the ordeal good naturedly.  Others hid themselves in different parts of the ship but were ferreted out by the detectives of the court. One coal-heaver afforded much amusement by trying to escape into the fore-top. Before he was half way up the rigging he had two of the police hanging from his legs and a number of others forcing him down from above. When finally dragged to the chair, he submitted with very bad grace, grappling with the barber and trying to pull him into the pool.  He was vigorously smeared with the lather, receiving an extra dose in the mouth, and was tumbled writhing and kicking into the water receiving an extra ducking for his resistance. When he emerged from the water he fairly roared like a wild beast.

Every one of the crew on board ship who had not before crossed the line underwent the initiation, the majority with very good grace. The ship’s corporal insisted that he had been across, but being brought before the board of inquisition, he could not bring forward sufficient evidence to convince them. Of the entire marine guard but a single man had before crossed the line—and beginning with the Orderly Sergeant, they all submitted to the ordeal. Taking the ceremony altogether it was very amusing and it did much to relieve the monotony of our voyage. No real indignity was offered the subjects of initiation.  After every man had been declared a son of Neptune, the chief actors in the function proceeded to unmask themselves. Neptune and Mrs. Neptune tore off their beard and tresses of manilla, the baby proved to be a swab dressed for the occasion, and the various retainers jumped into the pool and began to scrub off the lamp-black and vermillion with which their faces were liberally smeared. Mrs. Neptune’s face especially was a work of art, so delicately were her cheeks tinted.

Crossed the line between 11.30 and noon.

Lat. at noon  0 03 S.

Long. “   “   30 54 W.

Temperature between 78 and 80 F.  Saw a number of flying fish.  Scarcely realize that we had passed under equator from delightful trip.”

Ensign Safford’s journal is a study in keen observation, especially of the natural world. Here his ability to examine and understand a situation does us well with his description of a ceremony that is legendary in nature yet rarely described in full. And as can be seen from his description and the image from 1810, the ceremony had changed little to that point.

Thank you Paul Goodwin for a faithful transcription.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Springtime with the U.S.S VANDALIA, 1886

In the spring of 1886 a young ensign aboard the U.S.S. VANDALIA on a voyage down the east coast headed towards South America made a short landfall on Staten Island where he spent time with some friends, a Col. And Mrs. Pike, on a hiking expedition to see the local flora and fauna. This ensign, William Edwin Safford, who graduated from the Naval Academy six years earlier, would go on to a distinguished career with the Department of Agriculture as a botanist and eventually have a number of plants named after him. At this young age he exhibited an extraordinary enthusiasm and breadth of knowledge as a naturalist in the U.S. Navy.

One hundred and thirty four years later, the May weather in the northeast U.S. does not lend itself to vernal hikes as it did that year. With that in mind, listed below are a few of the musings of Ensign Safford as he recalls his walk with the learned Pikes, one a herpetologist and the other a nature watercolorist. In addition to the spring plants he mentions, he also writes about the salamanders of Staten Island.

“On the 22nd of May I went with these pleasant friends [Col. And Mrs. Pike] on a collecting excursion to Staten Island near the village of Tomkinson [ed. note, Tompkinsville] where there is a pretty sheet of water called Silver Lake.

In the open woods we found masses of yellow cinque-foil (Potentilla canadensis), the common buttercup (R. bullosis), the little yellow star-grass (Hypoxis erecta) and the pretty bluet (Houstonia coerulia). I collected also the minute Veronica serphyllifolia, and a pretty little yellow flower like a dwarf dandelion – Krigia virginica…

Crossing a field …..we saw great quantities of “Robin’s plantain” (Erigenen bellidifolluim Muhl) in full bloom, we arrived at a little brook, the outlet of Silver Lake. On its banks were thicket of alder; of “black haw”, which was covered with clusters of beautiful white Elder-like flowers (Sambucus); and of the pretty Ericaceons Lencother racemose covered with clusters of fragrant bell-shaped blossoms like miniature lillies-of-the-valley. Two other plants of the same order were in full bloom, the fragrant wild azalea (Rhododendum [Azalea] nudiflorum, L.) and the common huckleberry, and growing from the very margin of the brook were a number of delicate ferns among which of those which I had before seen at Flushing, the Osmundas being far enough advanced to distinguish two species (cinnamomea, and O. regalis). I found also a little white violet with a faint delicate fragrance [viola blanda] which I had before found in New Haven growing abundantly in wet places. It grew here on the very waters edge and near it I found a clump of yellow rag-wort (Senecis aureus, L.) in full bloom. [Of this genus there are but few species in the flora of the North Eastern United States.]”

Safford would go on to describe all manner of plants and animals on this cruise in the VANDALIA. Shown here is but one of the drawings our young naturalist would make along the way. This one in the South Atlantic. Shown is a Velella Velella which lives on the surface of the ocean. A common name today for this is By-the-wind-sailor.

Desc: 00001047

The spring of 2020 is best known today for the ravages the Covid-19 virus is wreaking all over the world. It has forced us all to work from home if we are lucky enough to do so. As part of the stay-at-home workforce is Dr. Paul Goodwin, a valued volunteer in the Collections Research Center at Mystic Seaport Museum. Paul has been going doggedly through all the manuscript material I can throw at him and has managed to keep transcribing day after day. His transcription prowess makes logbooks much easier to read for the rest of us. This journal kept by Ensign Safford is from the collection of the G.W. Blunt White Library and is identified in the collection as Log 123.

ROANN in Graphite and Watercolor

The Museum recently acquired a painting by Arthur Moniz of the dragger ROANN.

Seen below is a detail from a recent gift from the family of marine artist Arthur Moniz. The artist passed away this year and his widow kindly offered the painting of the Mystic Seaport Museum fishing vessel ROANN to us as a remembrance of her husband. Moniz used a combination of graphite drawings for detail with watercolor washes to give his paintings a unique texture.

Detail of ROANN, painted by Arthur Moniz.

Moniz worked with Museum volunteers in the ROANN program to get proper details of the ROANN for his painting. The ROANN is an eastern rig dragger with her pilothouse aft and working area amidships as opposed to western rig draggers with the pilothouse forward.

ROANN was designed by Albert Condon and built at the yard of Newbert and Wallace in Thomaston, Maine in 1947. ROANN is one of a number of fishing vessels in the Museum’s stable with the progression beginning with the EMMA C. BERRY, a Noank smack built in 1866, to the L.A. DUNTON, a Gloucester fishing schooner built in 1921, on to the FLORENCE, a western rig dragger built in 1926 and finally culminating with ROANN.

Arthur Moniz was a well-known artist in New Bedford and created numerous works on the subject of fisheries and whaling. We are glad to welcome this beautiful little representation of ROANN into the permanent collection of Mystic Seaport Museum.

Blockade-running Document Added to Mystic Seaport Collection

During the Civil War, a number of Confederate companies were formed for the sole purpose of running goods through the blockade. As with any other company, stock was sold to support the ventures. Here is one such stock.

The stock certificate seen here was from the Palmetto Exporting and Importing Company of Charleston, South Carolina. Why on earth would Mystic Seaport Museum be interested in such a certificate? The initial reason that caught our eye was the name of the person, W.R. Mallory, who paid two thousand dollars for two shares in the company. The Mallory family has been very involved with Mystic Seaport Museum since the 1930’s and at least four family members have held positions on the Museum’s Board of Directors. However, the more interesting aspect of the stock certificate in a maritime sense is that it represents shares in a company that ran blockade runners for the Confederacy during the Civil War.

Stock Certificate for the Palmetto Exporting and Importing Company

William Ravenel, listed as the President of the company in the lower right-hand corner, also held shares and board positions in at least one other blockade running company, the Importing and Exporting Company of South Carolina. It was one of the Palmetto Company’s boats, however, that encouraged blockade runners to once again use Charleston as a port of entry after most had abandoned it for Wilmington, North Carolina after the blockade of Charleston. While many blockade running boas were sleek, fast English-built steamers, Ravenel bought an old Charleston dredge, the GENERAL MOULTRIE, and in 1864 managed to send her through the blockade to Nassau in the Bahamas with a profitable cargo of cotton. As a matter-of-fact, the Palmetto Exporting and Importing Company (and the Exporting and Importing Company of South Carolina as well) was one of the few such companies to turn a profit. While Palmetto did not lose any money for its investors, the EICSC declared dividends totaling nearly 200 British Pounds and 9,000 Confederate dollars to investors by the time the company liquidated all its assets after the war.

Palmetto ran at least one other steamer through the blockade the same year as the GENERAL MOULTRIE. The GENRAL CLINCH made the same run to Nassau at the end of the year and both boats stayed there for the remainder of the war.

Much of the information here is taken from Stephen R. Wise’s Lifeline of the Confederacy: Blockade Running during the Civil War (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).

Papers pertaining to William Ravenel and his business interests are held at the South Carolina Historical Society.

Two New Portraits for Mystic Seaport Museum

Paintings of Captain George Seymore Brewster and his wife Mary Lockwood Clark Brewster were recently acquired by Mystic Seaport Museum.

The two paintings below are a recent acquisition via bequest from the estate of Barbara Snow Delaney, former managing editor of Antiques Magazine. Barbara and husband Edmund T. Delaney were very socially active in the Chester, CT community for many years, establishing the historical society among their activities. According to Barbara’s will, the paintings represent Stonington whaling Captain George Seymore Brewster and his wife Mary Lockwood Clark Brewster. It certainly appears that the portraits were executed at different times by two different hands, but likely in the 1840’s.

Captain and Mrs. George Brewster

George S. Brewster was from a family of seafaring men and two of his brothers also made their living as captains of whaleships. George’s brother William was also married to a woman named Mary who has become well known in maritime circles because of her writings as she sailed with her husband during his whaling career. And surprise! George’s brother Charles was married to a woman named…..Mary. Dinner talk must have been confusing when all three couples got together.

George S. Brewster, born in 1811, supposedly started his career in sailing vessels at the early age of 9, according to his obituary in the Stonington Mirror in 1882. Connecticut crew lists show him at the age of 13 as part of the crew of the sealing brig ALABAMA PACKET. During his career George commanded five different whaleships, the FELLOWES, FRANCIS, GEORGE, HELVETIUS and PHILETUS. The HELVETIUS was stranded off Oahu and was a total loss. Interestingly, each of the three brothers were in command of the PHILETUS during their careers.

George met an unusual and press worthy demise in August of 1882. He and his two brother captains were to be pall bearers at the funeral of their Aunt Lydia Chesebro who died at the age of 92. At this time George was a selectman of Stonington and after standing to say a few words about his aunt and her upstanding character, George went back to his pew, sat down, and died. His death caused quite a stir in the church and later in the community. His brothers went about the business of burying their aunt and then returned to the church to bear their brother back to his home where he was prepared for his own funeral.

Shipwreck Tales: Melancholy Women Found and Lost at Sea.

This project was sparked when I came across a description of Marian Moore’s personal narrative in the Mystic Seaport Collections Research Center online catalog. I wanted to know more about this “melancholy” woman who presented as a man at sea, and the harrowing details of her experiences with cannibalism and shipwreck, but there was no digital version of the text available at that time. Thus, a partnership began between the University of Rhode Island and the Library at Mystic Seaport Museum which allowed me to collaborate with the Museum in an effort to make several compelling narratives of shipwrecked women at sea available to scholars and enthusiasts around the globe through digital access.

Below are links to the digital archives of some of the most captivating shipwrecked women’s narratives that I worked to make available in the spring of 2018. In my selection of narratives that focus on the hardships endured by women while at sea, I wanted to make more visible the gendered and moralizing constraints placed on women while on land and how voyages at sea, while dangerous, often presented the promise of a more negotiable and open space for self-definition. More broadly, I wanted to make narratives that have often been overlooked or neglected more accessible to a larger audience.

Marian Moore’s narrative invites many ways to interpret Moore’s piece, from focusing on larger genre categorization (is this text truly a personal narrative as it presents itself to be, domestic fiction, a blend of genre?) to the provocative poetic disruptions which break Moore’s at times journalistic approach and at other times pathos-driven style of narration.

Julia Dean’s narrative, touted as a tale of a “veritable female Robinson Crusoe” depicts the wonderful adventures of a woman who remained on an uninhabited island for nine years. Positioning herself as a novice writer and most certainly not an egoist, Dean recounts her acts of bravery, most notably the depiction of her wrestling and bludgeoning an amphibious animal’s throat.

Since the Father of Mercies has seen it fit to deliver her from “the hands of barbarians,” Mrs. Eliza Fraser feels justified in publishing her own captivity narrative in spite of her reluctance and fear of her “indifferent education” and being deprived of her husband’s influence and support. Her self-described “plain, unvarnished tale” depicts her suffering experienced at the hands of what she disparagingly describes as “savages”, an unspecified group of Indigenous captors, which she finally evades with the help of a thirteen-man crew led by Lieutenant Otter and Graham. In the afterward, the reader is told that “probably through modesty” Mrs. Fraser has omitted the account of the birth of her baby which drowns while onboard the rescue vessel.

Flora A. Foster recounts her experiences of being wrecked en route to Peru off the coast of Patagonia with her husband, First Officer Robert Foster while aboard the MARY E. PACKER, a vessel built in Mystic, Connecticut. As fate would have it, after surviving their time on Carmen and finding passage back to New York aboard the brig EMILY T. SHELTON, Robert Foster plummets to his death from the topsail when only 300 miles from New York, making Foster’s descriptions early on in the narrative of how perilous the “cruel partings, the months and years of separation, the long dreary hours of loneliness and anxiety, the constant, unremitting strain of heart and brain” to only be understood by those separated from “dear ones at sea” all the more poignant.

Caroline Stoddard’s diary details her train trip from Boston, Massachusetts to San Francisco, California to join her husband Captain Thomas C. Stoddard for a voyage to Australia. Of particular note are Stoddard’s descriptions of her natural surroundings. Her style of writing can be likened to the “very pretty sheets of water, lying so quietly many hundred feet above the sea” that she uses to describe Donner Lake. This focus on the pleasantries of nature shifts from depictions of the Salt Lakes and the Sierra mountain range to a more critical tone of her physical environment after she experiences a harrowing shipwreck. Having to spend five days in a boat before being rescued by the brig COMMERCE of Sydney, Australia deeply unsettles Stoddard, but she continually returns to a focus on descriptions of nature to soothe her anxiety as she finds comfort in the “large bushes of heliotropes” in New Zealand that remind her of familiar “lilac bushes.”

Contained within William Dorset Fellowes text describing the tragic events of the Lady Hobart is the inclusion of the curious particulars of Emmanuel Sosa and his wife, Eleonora Garcia Sala, who were shipwrecked on the east coast of Africa. The hero identified in the narrative is Emmanuel, while his wife Eleonora is also described favorably but also complicatedly gendered as “a woman of a masculine courage.” Finding themselves in a compromising position with a group of Caffres, the heroic Emmanuel fails to listen both to the advice he received previously from a king about the threats he faces in the region and the admonitions of Eleonora that Sosa not trust the Caffres. Eleonora alone resists the attacks from the Caffres and is stripped of her clothing. Refusing to be seen in a vulnerable state, Eleonora buries herself in the sand while Sosa wanders aimlessly in search of resources to rescue his family to no avail.

In the longest text that I digitized this spring, William Allen’s Accounts of Shipwreck and of Other Disasters at Sea, is not only useful for mariners, but arguably for a larger public. What follows is what can be described as a compilation of melancholic and tragic greatest hits in the annals of shipwreck. Of particular interest are the sparse representations of women at sea, sometimes mentioned only by their first name with a reference to the vessel they were aboard, or cataloged simply by a number, such as the “317 women aboard who were lost at sea.” This particular text provides many narratives which can undoubtedly be mined for further historical and literary analysis.

Marian Moore

Miss Julia Dean

Mrs. Eliza Fraser

Flora A. Foster

Caroline Stoddard

Eleanora Garcia Sala

Drew of the Sloop Nautilus and Others

 

Danielle Cofer is a third-year PhD candidate in the English Department at the University of Rhode Island.

A “New” Mediterranean Passport

The G.W. Blunt White Library acquires a Mediterranean Passport, also known as a ship’s passport, for a locally-built ship.

A recent acquisition by the Library has links to both the local area and our own collections. The document pictured below, a Mediterranean Passport, pertains to the ship ORRIS of New York in 1809. The ORRIS was built in Old Mystic with Christopher Leeds as the master carpenter. She measured 249 tons and was 87 feet in length. The signature at the bottom right belongs to the collector of the port of New York, David Gelston, whose digitized collection of papers is in our library.

Mediterranean Passport for Ship ORRIS

According to Doug Stein’s American Maritime Documents:

“The Mediterranean Passport, commonly called a ship’s passport, was created after the United States concluded a treaty with Algiers in 1795. During the early years of independence, America was one of several nations paying tribute to the Barbary states in exchange for the ability to sail and conduct business in the Mediterranean area without interference..…the “Passport” would be recognized by Algeria and later by other Barbary states through similar treaties……

…it was a printed document, on vellum, that measured approximately 15″  by 11″. Centered in the upper half were two engravings, one below the other. Signatures of the President of the United States, Secretary of State, and Customs Collector appear in the lower right-hand corner. The United States seal is in the lower left-hand corner.”

A distinct characteristic “was the presence of a scalloped line of indenture across the upper part of the document which was used as a method of authentication.”

Although faded, you can see that our example has the signature of the President, James Madison, the Secretary of State, Robert Smith and the Collector of Customs for the port of New York, David Gelston.

Royals in the Collections

During a visit to Nassau in the Bahamas in 1944, Cora Mallory Munson spent time with former King Edward VIII, the Duke of Windsor and his wife, the former Wallis Simpson. Some mementos from the trip are in the manuscript collection of the G.W. Blunt White Library.

The manuscripts collection in the G.W Blunt White Library is full of surprises. You never know what you will find while looking for something completely different.

The following pieces from the collection should be of some interest to those of you who are Netflix fanatics and currently enjoying the second season of The Crown about the life and times of Queen Elizabeth II. The cards, personal notes and photograph all came to us through the Mallory family, many of whom have been involved with the Museum since the 1930’s. Cora Mallory Munson, to whom the items are addressed, was the sister of Clifford Day Mallory and Philip R. Mallory, both of whom served as President of the Board of Mystic Seaport. Mrs. Munson was married to Frank C. Munson, a shipping executive who was memorialized by Mrs. Munson with the creation of the Munson Institute graduate studies program at Mystic Seaport in the 1950’s.

The cards and photo were sent separately to Mrs. Munson by Edward, the Duke of Windsor and his wife, Wallis Simpson, Duchess of Windsor. At the time the cards were sent to Cora, Edward was in his last months as Governor of the Bahamas, resigning in March, 1945 with his last official day being April 30, coincidentally the day that Hitler committed suicide. The optics of this was certainly unusual as Edward had been labelled a Nazi sympathizer.

One of two cards sent to Cora Mallory Munson at Christmas, 1944 by Edward and Wallis.

Edward’s refusal to leave Wallis led to his abdication in 1936, turning the crown over to his brother who became George VI, the father of Elizabeth. In 1941 Edward became the governor of the Bahamas. In 1944 the pair made a trip to the States, including Newport, Rhode Island. Wallis had surgery in New York in August to remove some cancerous tumors, but obviously by the time the Christmas notes were sent, she was feeling much better. She went on to live another 42 years.

Note from Wallis to Cora thanking her for a gift and mentioning a get together.

Unfortunately, we do not have further documentation concerning the circumstances around reason for the note and cards to Cora, but she was obviously well acquainted. Her note is signed “Wallis Windsor.”

Note from Edward to Cora.
Wallis and Edward coming ashore.

While there is nothing written on or with the photograph, the context of the notes along with the image of the harbor suggests that this picture was taken in Nassau.

There are many such surprises hidden in our collections and it is always a pleasure to unexpectedly happen upon one.

New MORGAN-related Acquisition

In October of 1859 Captain James Hamilton took over command of the CHARLES W. MORGAN for a voyage to the Pacific and the Arctic Oceans. Along the way the MORGAN made stops in Chile, Hawaii and Japan among other places. The MORGAN left New Bedford a few weeks before John Brown’s famous raid on Harper’s Ferry and returned home, surprisingly safely, during the midst of the Civil War in 1863, nearly four years after departing. When she left, James Buchanan was president. When she returned, Abraham Lincoln was dealing with the recent defeat of Union forces at Chancellorsville where total casualties for both sides totaled more than 30,000 men.

Prices had escalated during the war and the MORGAN’s return grossed over $165,000, making it the MORGAN’s most successful voyage of her career. The MORGAN, however, did have a few casualties of her own during the voyage. A journal kept on board by Hamilton notes that seaman Francis Lacock drowned after being dragged out of a whaleboat, the second mate had a finger amputated by the captain after a whale gun exploded, and a boatsteerer, M.A. Brady, fell from the mast top and broke his jaw in multiple places.

The image here represents one of the ship’s papers for the 1859-63 voyage. The G.W. Blunt White Library also holds Hamilton’s journal of the voyage. This paper, a four-language sea letter (17″ by 22″) was recently purchased at auction and carries the signatures of President Buchanan, Secretary of State Lewis Cass and Deputy Director of Customs, James Taylor, listed as the Notary Public. The seal of the United States can be clearly seen in the detail image.

(click image to enlarge)

The following description of a sea letter is excerpted from Doug Stein’s American Maritime Documents:

“The term ‘Sea Letter’ has been used to describe any document issued by a government or monarch to one of its merchant fleet, which established proof of nationality and guaranteed protection for the vessel and her owners. However, it is the Sea Letter used by the United States after 1789 that is of particular interest here.

The 1822 edition of The Merchants and Shipmaster’s Assistant described the Sea Letter as a document which ‘specifies the nature of the cargo and the place of destination,’ and says that is was only required for vessels bound to the Southern Hemisphere… In 1859 the document was defined as part of the ship’s papers when bound on a foreign voyage, ‘…it is written in four languages, the French, Spanish, English, and Dutch, and is only necessary for vessels bound round Cape Horn and the Cape of Good Hope.’

The statement within the document conveys in part that the vessel described is owned entirely by American citizens, and requests that all ‘Prudent Lords, Kings, Republics, Princes, Dukes, Earls, Barons, Lord, Burgomasters, Schepens, Consullors…’ etc., treat the vessel and her crew with fairness and respect. The signatures of the President of the United Stated, the Secretary of State, and the customs collector appear, usually in the middle portion of the document. Sea Letters are mentioned in the formative maritime legislation forged by the new Federal governments. Like passports, they provided additional evidence of ownership an nationality, but the criteria by which a shipmaster utilized one document over the other is not completely clear. It was explained at the time that both documents were ‘rendered necessary of expedient by reason of treaties with foreign powers,’ a statement which suggests that certain nations required a particular document because of existing agreements with the United States.

In any case the Sea Letter was valid for only a single voyage, and a bond does not seem to have been required. Neither was it to be returned to the collector when the voyage was completed. Indications are that, as the years progressed, Sea Letters were being used more often by whaling ships than by merchant vessels, perhaps because American whalers fished in areas where this document was preferred as proof of national origin.”

Mystic Seaport continues to collect such documents through purchase and gift on a regular basis. This particular paper was a nice find for the collection and we look forward to making additional discoveries in the future.

Mark Twain and the Whaling Captain

Captain James Smith left whaling to become a packet captain and a foil for Mark Twain.

The painting seen below depicts Captain James F. Smith of New London, one of five brothers who were whaling captains out of that port. All had successful careers and their combined return on all their voyages grossed over 1.2 million dollars. Quite an accomplishment for the mid-19th century.

Captain James F. Smith. Mystic Seaport Accession Number 1939.1295

To get ahead and succeed in such a business obviously took a bit of spunk and our man James seems to certainly have had a surfeit of it.  The whaleships he commanded, beginning in 1824, were the COMMODORE PERRY, the PHOENIX, the BINGHAM, the COLUMBIA and the HIBERNIA. According to former Mystic Seaport Curator Edouard Stackpole, Smith had quite a reputation as a rough and tumble captain with one story having him “beating the tar” out of a rival British whaling master while ashore in some foreign port.

After leaving whaling, Smith sailed packets for some years between San Francisco and Hawaii. It was on a trip to Hawaii as a passenger that Smith achieved the dubious honor of becoming a character in not one, but two different stories written by Mark Twain. It seems that on the passage to Hawaii on board the ship AJAX in 1866 Twain met Smith (alias “Captain Cuttle” per Twain) who was accompanied by two New London whaling captains, Asa Fish (“Captain Fitch”) and W.H. Phillips (“Captain Phelps”). In a spate of writing that launched his career, Twain wrote a series of letters from Hawaii  for the Sacramento Union in 1866. In them he writes about all three captains and their boisterous card games where they engaged in nautical repartee and drank copious amounts of whiskey (nineteen gallons according to Twain).  Smith also appears as the “Old Admiral” in Twain’s Roughing It. The introduction of Smith in the book is as follows: “And then there was “the old Admiral” – a retired whaleman.  He was a roaring, terrific combination of wind and lightning and thunder, and earnest, whole-hearted profanity. But nevertheless he was tender-hearted as a girl. He was a raving, deafening, devastating typhoon, laying waste the cowering seas, but with an unvexed refuge in the center where all comers were safe at rest.”

It is difficult to imagine that the serene person in the painting  with one of his whaleships in the background could be a “roaring, terrific combination of wind and lightning and thunder,” but then again, looks can be deceiving.

 

America Enters WWI 100 Years Ago

American artists created dramatic works to support the war effort in 1917-18.

One hundred years ago this month, in November of 1917, America suffered its first casualties on the battlefields of Europe. During the one year that the United States would be engaged in the war, over 100,000 Americans would lose their lives with nearly twice as many being wounded. The war to end all wars required a  tremendous amount of ships to get those American troops and wartime supplies to the allies on the continent.

The U.S. Shipping Board, organized in 1916 to regulate U.S. merchant shipping, created the Emergency Fleet Corporation in 1917 once the U.S entered the war. The EFC was created specifically to oversee the vast shipbuilding programs that would be needed during the war. In its early stages, the EFC was managed by General George Goethals of Panama Canal fame. However, infighting, corruption and other problems plagued the organization and millionaire Edward Hurley was eventually brought in as chairman to create some stability.

In addition to building ships for the war effort, one thing the U.S. Shipping Board and Emergency Fleet Corporation did very well was to hire artists to create dramatic propaganda posters to raise money to support U.S endeavors. The poster seen below was produced by artist James Henry Daugherty who trained at the Corcoran Gallery in Washington D.C. Interestingly enough, Daugherty became best known for writing and illustrating children’s books, winning both the Caldecott and Newbury awards during his lifetime.

The Ships Are Coming. Mystic Seaport Accession Number 1971.234.9

Other heroic posters showing shipbuilders, soldiers and sailors created for the period included titles such as “Rivets are Bayonets, Drive Them Home!”; “Teamwork Builds Ships”; “On the Job for Victory”; “Make Every Minute Count for Pershing.” And many more.

While the EFC and the Shipping Board continued to have managerial problems after the war, many of the artists went on to bigger and better things as evidenced by Daugherty’s success.

Artistic Inspiration at Sea

A new book about illustrations by whalemen has connections to Mystic Seaport collection.

Michael P. Dyer is the Senior Maritime Historian at the New Bedford Whaling Museum. He recently wrote a book entitled “O’er the Wide and Tractless Sea: Original Art of the Yankee Whale Hunt.” In the book are a myriad of illustrations created by whalemen in logbooks and journals depicting the hunt and much more. In a New York Times interview Dyer notes that he had “not yet been able to connect a whaling scene drawn in a journal with a whaling scene engraved on a whale’s tooth.” However, a number of other interesting connections can be made between ships, sailors, illustrations and objects.

Published 2017, Old Dartmouth Historical Society, New Bedford, MA.

The following image is taken from a journal in the New Bedford collection. Sailing out of Mystic, Connecticut in 1843, seaman Washington Foster kept this finely illustrated journal during a voyage to the Indian Ocean in search of elephant seals, more commonly known to sailors as sea elephants. Like whales, sea elephants were killed for their blubber which could be boiled down into oil that could be used for lubrication and lighting.

Washington Foster Journal. From Dyer’s “O’er the Wide and Tractless Sea” , page 101.

Mystic Seaport has an object directly related to the journal kept by Foster and while it was supposedly used as a club in the killing of the giant seals that can range between 3 and 4 tons in weight and 15 to 20 feet in length, it is likely that it was kept more as a showpiece than a killing tool. A heavy sperm whale tooth with a handle bound in rope, the carver’s name and ship and date appear on one side, while the other side has this unusual and imaginative scene probably dreamed up after reading one of the many books on pirates and shipwrecks of the period.

Sea Elephant Club by Washington Foster. MSM accession number 1939.2077

The scantily clad woman bound to the ship awaits a savior while crying out, “Help, Help, Help. Is there nowon to save the fair damsle from the freebooters lewd embrase.” It’s clear that Foster, like so many other whalers and sealers of the time, had an active artistic streak and kept himself occupied during the long sailing days with pen, ink, paints and scimshanding tools. Michael Dyer’s book is a tremendous resource for examining the art of the whaleman and is a great jumping-off point to make other connections to the creative side of these roamers of the world’s oceans.

New MORGAN Model Gift

Mystic Seaport receives a new gift in the form of a miniature ship model of the CHARLES W. MORGAN.

Literally thousands of people over the years have built models of the CHARLES W. MORGAN. Some makers used kits to build full-rigged models of the whaler, including at least one kit that was made for a “MORGAN in the bottle” model. We have one kit in our collection that was originally produced in 1939. MORGAN plans are one of our hottest sellers in the Ships Plans collection and many have used the lines from here to make their own hand-crafted version of the pride of our Museum. We field calls weekly from people who want to donate their, or their family member’s, home-made model. Unfortunately, the Museum only has so much space to house models and if we accepted every MORGAN model offered to us we’d have no room for any other model, and we have nearly a thousand. Any MORGAN model we accept has to be truly exceptional. For example, we have one that was given to us a number of years ago that was made by master model maker Lloyd McCaffrey.

Lloyd’s miniature cutaway model is extraordinary, with exposed interior accommodations and a center section of built-up frames all of which are treenail fastened. The mid-ship section shows interior ceiling planks installed and authentic stowage of gear and whale oil casks.  On deck includes all appropriate furniture, fittings and details (binnacle, skylights, anchors, companionways, windlass, hatches, tryworks, cooper’s bench, etc). It is a truly magnificent piece and any maritime museum would be thrilled to have it.

We feel the same way about a new MORGAN model that just came in to us from a California collector and member. This model is more than a model. The creator of this model was highlighted in an article in the Fall/Winter issue of Mystic Seaport Magazine by Curator Fred Calabretta. In the article Fred quotes the model maker, Alexander Law, as stating that he feels his models are more akin to marine fine arts because of the detail he puts into the map making that graces the base under the model; the research that goes into creating the model and the scene; the cabinetry work to create the base and more. We have a fine collection of Law models that came to the Museum in 1961, so it is very satisfying to add one of the Museum’s flagship, the CHARLES W. MORGAN, this year.

Model of the CHARLES W. MORGAN by Alexander Law. A 2017 donation.

Dozens of museums around the globe have exquisite models of the MORGAN, making her one of the best-known vessels in the world. Go to the website for the 38th voyage of the MORGAN and you can see why so many people remain excited about this icon of American sea voyaging, and why we are excited to have such a fine representation of the whaler in miniature.

The Map and Chart Collection at Mystic Seaport

Two grants from private foundations helped to arrange, describe and create a database of the chart and map collection at Mystic Seaport, a heretofore underutilized collection.

Beginning in the early 1930’s, Mystic Seaport began collecting, among many other things, charts and maps of the entire world. Many of the charts we received came as parts of larger gifts that included logbooks and business papers of ships from ports up and down the east coast. Many of the charts were used aboard ship and show the wear and tear of numerous sea journeys as well as the penciled tracks that the ships folowed on their trek around the globe. One such chart in our possession belonged to Mystic captain Joseph Warren Holmes, someone who spent almost his entire life at sea. Indeed, Holmes holds the record for any sailing ship captain going around Cape Horn on journeys between the east and west coast. 84 times around the Horn.

Captain Joseph Warren Holmes of Mystic, CT. Photograph accession number 1937.63

And we have the charts he used on many of those trips. One such chart shows the penciled markings of numerous trips around the Horn with many separate lines converging at the tip of South America to form one thick, black line that looks as if the good captain was using fat-tipped magic markers instead of a pencil.

Some incredible people represented in our collection of well over 10,000 charts and maps include Irving and Exy Johnson, the husband and wife team that began taking young adults around the world on adventures in the 1930’s. We have hundreds of the charts used by the Johnsons as  they made there way to Tahiti, New Guinea and other exotic areas both before and after World War II.

Other charts express the American spirit of enterprise and exploration. The whalers of the early to mid-1800’s who ventured into the unknown in search of their quarry whose oil would light the lamps of the world. Below is an advertising label that appears on one of those charts used by a whaler out of New Bedford.

Most of the charts and maps date from the 19th and 20th centuries, but there are a number that predate the period as well, such as the collection of charts from 1671 called the English Pilot and published by John Seller. As the world experiences rising sea levels, accurate charts such as the Atlantic Neptune, a series of detailed charts of the American coastline published by the British Admiralty in the late 18th century, can be used to compare the current coastal outlines to those of centuries past.

Two grants over the last three years from the Acorn Foundation and the Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation, gave us the resources to hire an expert to both assess and catalog the collection to make it more readily accessible to our research community.

Title page from The English Pilot, 1671.

The chart and map collection is one of many truly extraordinary collections at Mystic Seaport. You can see the description of the entire collection and the list of charts here.

21st Century Drone Meets a 19th Century Clock

Museum staff use a drone to understand conservation issues on a 19th- century tower clock.

Back in February, volunteer Jim Anderson was interviewed for an article about the work he and another volunteer, Bill Michael, were doing on the Museum’s 1857 tower clock located in the Greenmanville Church. You can see that article here. In it, Jim talks of the challenges the two men faced in repairing the mechanism that runs the four separate clock faces, one for each face of the tower. While Jim and Bill have worked wonders with the clock, they still face a few challenges to keep the clock running regularly.

One issue that raises its ugly head on occasion is the fact that the clock stops before the regular rewinding because of a problem with hands on one of the faces binding. Because the problem seems to be on the exterior of the building, and the building is quite high, the two decided to contact our Film and Video crew to help troubleshoot the matter. That’s right, film and video. You see, Dan Harvison and Brandon Morgan, the creative team that shoots and produces much of the Museum’s programs, have been trained in operating a drone for their work. In order to get some good shots of the clock hands to see how they are attached on the outside of the building, Dan was asked to pilot the mosquito-sounding drone close enough to the tower to try and get appropriately detailed images to analyze the problem. Once the issues are identified, someone will still need to get in a lift and take their tools up to do the job, but our hope is that we will only need to employ the bucket lift once, rather than twice. See some images of the shooting below.

Dan Harvison operates the drone under the watchful eyes of Anderson, Michael and O’Pecko.
The drone moves in for a close-up of the east clock face.

A Packet Ship’s Demise and a Book’s Salvation

When the Packet Ship Leeds wrecked in 1828, Mate George Kurtz rescued one of the ship’s library books.

In 1828 George Kurtz left New York City as the mate of the ship LEEDS on its last voyage as an American packet ship. Kurtz, born in Philadelphia in 1803, had received his seaman’s protection certificate in the port of New York in January of the previous year. The LEEDS had been a Liverpool packet from 1823 until 1828, beginning her career about 5 years after the commencement of the American packet trade. Packet ships were vessels that sailed on a regular schedule, whether they had a full cargo hold and passenger contingent or not.

According to Robert G. Albion in his book Square Riggers on Schedule about the packet trade, the LEEDS lasted only 6 years in packet service after some unusual happenings over the years. Early in her career she was grounded in the Mersey River at Liverpool and only survived because she was so strongly built. Another episode had her Captain discharged for trying to smuggle contraband in a bale of hay. Her final indignity was suffered on Christmas Eve of 1828, soon after she became a London packet. She ran aground in the Thames and was “bilged” according to the Shipping and Commercial List and New York Price Current for February 14, 1829. The March 11 issue of the same paper noted that Captain Sprague had to sell her after the vessel was condemned on January 21st.

The image above is taken from the inside cover of a book from the LEEDS’ ship’s library. The penmanship belongs to our friend George Kurtz who must have rescued the book the day before the vessel was condemned. There are two unusual things about the image. The first being Kurtz’ use of the word “police” after the phrase “lost on the Thames.” The second is the unusual ship’s stamp on the right hand side. This coat of arms, if you will, of the ship says “Packet Ship Leeds New York and L’pool.” In addition to the triumvirate of owls shown, the shield seems to bear the image of some form of livestock (cow or pig) being carried by a bird of some sort.

Captain Benjamin Sprague of Bridgewater, Massachusetts, had been a packet ship captain for about 5 years prior to his losing the LEEDS. He does not appear as a packet captain afterwards. George Kurtz, however, appears at least once as a captain in 1839 aboard the ship OHIO trading between New York and New Orleans. The book that was saved by George is The Percy Anecdotes, by Sholto and Reuben Percy, published in New York in 1822.

The name at the top of the page, James Brown Bach, is a bit of a mystery. He may have been another crew member, but that is unknown at this point. However, it seems likely that he is the James Brown Bach who was born in 1808 and died when he was only 33 years old. His name appears on a passenger list returning to New York from London in October of 1829. His son, James Brown Bach, would go on to be a pioneer in American baseball in forming the Niagara Club in Buffalo, New York, in the mid-1850’s according to the book Base Ball Pioneers, 1850-1870.

The Percy Anecdotes was brought to the G.W. Blunt White Library by one of our many dedicated volunteers.

Early Lithograph at Mystic Seaport

The CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON is a fine example of an early American lithograph.

The lithograph of the steamer CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON is a fine example of an early black and white lithograph at Mystic Seaport. A group of print aficionados recently visited Curator Fred Calabretta for a look at some of the Museum’s finer prints and the print seen below was pointed out as a fine example from one of the earliest lithography companies in America.

Lithograph, CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON, Accession Number 1961.43, Mystic Seaport

Lithography in the United States started coming into its own in the 1820’s and the firm of William and John Pendleton in Boston was one of the premier producers of lithographs at the time, employing and training a host of young artists, including Fitz Hugh (now known as Fitz Henry) Lane, Moses Swett, Benjamin Nutting and others. Nathaniel Currier of Currier and Ives got his early training there beginning at the age of 15.

The steamboat CHANCELLOR LIVINGSTON was built in New York in 1816 and was used on the Hudson River route from New York to Albany and in 1825 headed the procession of boats to New York from Albany after the official opening of the Erie Canal. In 1827 she was sold to go into service on Long Island Sound, but needed to be rebuilt first, giving her the appearance that you see above.

We can date this print pretty accurately to the spring of 1828 for two reasons. The print shows her going into Newport, Rhode Island and it was in the spring of that year that she began her New York to Providence run. Also, the artist that produced the image for the lithograph was Moses Swett who left Pendleton’s that year to join the Senefelder Lithographic Co. His first lithograph for the company appeared in June of 1828, so it seems to be a pretty tight window in which this print would have been published.

The Museum boasts a remarkable print collection pertaining to the American maritime experience and this one is certainly one of the pioneering pieces.